my final little update on this guy. i’m building a trick bike next.
sawed-off bmx handebars, no brakes. let the hate begin.
brakes are for pussies ;-p
Submitted by Dr. Leaf
Track, Fixed Gear and Single Speed Bike Gallery









(116 votes, average: 5.09 )

my final little update on this guy. i’m building a trick bike next.
sawed-off bmx handebars, no brakes. let the hate begin.
brakes are for pussies ;-p
Submitted by Dr. Leaf
![]()
92 Comments Received
September 13th, 2010 @1:18 pm
I like it…But I didn’t know brakes were for pussies. I must be doin something wrong in the bedroom then.
September 13th, 2010 @1:48 pm
no brakes are for morons :-p
ps this pussy got laid last night giggity
bike is crazy looking, i will give plus points for originality…always dug the frame, although i think i liked one of the first incarnations of this bike better.
September 13th, 2010 @2:06 pm
Enjoy takin a nutter into that stem.
September 13th, 2010 @5:35 pm
Previous looked better,but like it,all I would do is put on some lower profile bmx bars these are just too tall for the looks
September 13th, 2010 @5:43 pm
getting sick of this bike and now the ‘tude.do something to this turd if you can.those bars are gross on this frame,try something real
September 13th, 2010 @6:12 pm
@broom wagon – that image is a gem. thank you
September 13th, 2010 @6:35 pm
Not into it.
September 13th, 2010 @6:37 pm
Dr. Leaf , I think this trickster bike needs some therapy.
September 13th, 2010 @9:06 pm
No wood!
September 14th, 2010 @1:19 am
heh i was just kidding about the pussy comment guys, don’t go cramming brakes where they don’t belong.
i’m president of a bicycle club called Doom Riders, so it’s only natural i inject some doom in my riding. anyways, i’ve been riding for 15 years, and it’s just more fun without brakes…and more of a commitment. it also seems silly to use brakes when riding a ‘track’ bike on fixed gear, it negates the function of the fixed cog, you should just go freewheel. the point of riding fixed gear is to be in sync with and maintain better control of the bike–a good rider should strive to gain 100% control and, as they say, be ‘one’ with the bike.
besides, this final setup is so comfy, still speedy, and so easy to skid. it’s taken all these years of tinkering to get this setup right. my favorite ride thus far.
September 14th, 2010 @3:24 am
blah blah blah blah…BAM!
September 14th, 2010 @5:17 am
OK, I will get a Frontal Lobotomy and Ride Brakeless and Brainless and remove the Dia-Compe Center Pull from my Wife’s Honey Pot and run for vice president of the Doom’s day riders.
September 14th, 2010 @6:14 am
ooohhh,Doom Riders-Kool name,strikes fear and revulsion into all that hear it.Do you have colors too?Share a clubhouse with the HeManWomanHaters?Is PeeWee the President.Brakeless,clueless,Dumb Riders.
September 14th, 2010 @6:21 am
Cheer up and ride Slomensh. It is a beautiful day here in the Midwest, must paint the gutters before the Snow flies.
September 14th, 2010 @6:23 am
I was kind of done trying to say anything about the brakeless riding anymore because when some people don’t want to hear reason or sense they won’t hear it. I do feel the need to comment on your comment Dr. Leaf, not to try to start a pointless argument, but more to point out a misconception. Brakes do not negate the function of a fixed cog because a fixed cog/chain/chainwheel/crank is not a braking system. You can use it as a braking system the same way you can use a screwdriver to open a box or a credit card to open a door, but it is not the tool’s intended function. A braking system should have a minimal number of failure points. When you’re dealing with a normal brake line the failure points would be the parts in the lever, cable, and brake. Even if a strand in the cable snaps you still have numerous cable strands that will hold solid. In addition to that, most brake cables run through housing to help guide the cable, allow the stopping points needed to engage, keep the cable clean, and to protect it from higher probability of damage. By using a crank/chain/cog as a brake, you have literally hundreds of possible failure points. The chain by itself, which is held together by pressure only, normally has four pieces per link. Multiply that per the number of links in your chain and you have the number of potential failure points for just your chain. That’s not mentioning the teeth on your cog and chain rings, the pieces of your bottom bracket, and rear hub. Also with a crank/chain/cog system ALL of the parts are under strain ALL of the time. When you stop with your chain you’re adding pressure to a system that already has tension on it and increasing the possibility of something along the line to fail. In addition to all of that, most people currently riding without brakes are not riding with any kind of a chain guard on their bike so their chain is completely exposed to the elements and debris from the road which could both lead to unexpected failures. Also also, the chain line only works in a very specific plane. If your chain comes off that plane for any reason your braking system is completely gone. If your brake cable shifts around on your bike the system will still work. Overall, the current brakeless trend comes from velodrome riders taking their bikes to the streets years ago and not having mounts for brakes. The reason that chains could be used as brakes on the velodrome is because if your chain snaps on the track (which happens more often than you’d think) you can coast to the bottom of the track and get off. There is no cross traffic, no cars, no pedestrians, no curbs, on road debris, etc etc. The case is not the same when commuting. I could go on and on (and I have in other posts) but I think the point I’m driving at now is clear.
So, if you want to ride brakeless that’s fine by me. My concern is that with your comment you’re misinterpreting purpose of drive and safety systems on a bike and while it may not matter to you since you’ve had years of experience with riding in your particular fashion, you could be passing on that misconception on to other people looking around on the internet that don’t know any better. You could be talking some kid into putting him/herself in danger for the wrong reason. Also you have to think, all you’re telling someone to do is go without brakes. I’m sure your bike is set up to stop as safe as it could without brakes, but what about the teenage kid that doesn’t know how to make sure his chain has proper tension before he tries to use it as his/her sole braking system? You’re not explaining that there is more that goes into stopping without a brake than just removing the brake, so you may be talking some kid into removing his brake, going out on the street, trying to stop and having their chain slip and crashing into someone or something. The purpose built brake systems are setup in a way that even if everything isn’t 100 percent on it as far as quality or maintenance it will still stop the bike. If anything is off with your method you could lose complete control over the bike.
The last thing I’ll say about your comment about becoming one with a bike. If you can’t gain 100% control and learn the art of cycling by having a brake on the bike (that you don’t even have to use if you don’t want to and can be left there just as an emergency measure) then you’re not a versatile cyclist. There is an art to braking with purpose built brakes that is just as much if not more challenging to learn. Gaining 100% control and becoming one with a bike in the commuting sense (most of the people on this site and on bikes are commuters) is having all of the purpose built systems on the bike and understanding and being able to use them all. You can’t do that if you’re missing parts of the equation. You’re 100% control over 90% of your bike. That’s not becoming one, that’s becoming .9
September 14th, 2010 @7:33 am
Haters!
September 14th, 2010 @8:11 am
i am not gonna say anything anymore. ^^
nice bike btw.
September 14th, 2010 @8:12 am
Pretty much the reply I was expecting.
September 14th, 2010 @8:24 am
no cs its just that i am tired..
you are 100% right in your post. but riding brakeless is nothing you do because you actually think it is the best way to stop or because you think a brake would be useless. you do it because its fun… so i guess all your well thought comment wont change anything if someone wants to ride brakeless.
as i said before i have come to the point that i WANT a brake. just because i want to be able to ride faster and more fluent and not having to slow down 100 meters in advance if i see a red light..
i think it is possible to ride brakeless and ride safe if you use a small ratio like 42/16. but still ..if i go full speed and my chain snaps i am pretty much F***ed…
so dont think i am not with you on your posts or i dont understand or something.
September 14th, 2010 @9:50 am
@daniel, I was referring to the Drew’s comment not yours. Your comment must have shown up right before my second one.
September 14th, 2010 @10:40 am
Question, I have not broken a chain but if it breaks on a fixed gear it may jam things up if you are unlucky it seems to me. This could cause a wheel lockup unexpectedly like a Wooden shoe in the machinery. Sabotage ? CS you must have slept well last nite, longest post in ages. I agree also but would like to try 42/16 and skid for a change as Daniel has done with his knees 38 years younger than mine. (maybe I should go 39/18 )
September 14th, 2010 @10:49 am
oooommmm.oooommm.enjoy the Zen experience of skid stops and brake free transport.also the joy of knee replacement.just be careful out there.the world needs more old farts-I mean real riders-for balance.the rubber keep under you yes?
September 14th, 2010 @10:58 am
Not to worry, I will KEEP the brake on just screw around on the 42/18 or whatever for an experiment. Did the Superman coaster ride at Great America ONE time also. Not to be repeated. If it had been two times longer I would surely have puked , and people enjoy that feeling ? One dislocated shoulder and one knee both on the right side, that is enough for me. Thanks.
September 14th, 2010 @1:50 pm
I have been trying really hard to avoid getting into this as a) I could not be more bored by this argument; and b) it doesn’t get us anywhere: no one is convinced one way or the other; no one changes anything; nothing is resolved. But I can not resist: Daniel: in general I admire your desire not to mindlessly go with the flow and speak your mind. But here you are missing a crucial point that has been brought up before: the risks that are taken on by riding brakeless are NOT just borne by you, the rider. But also by all of the pedestrians, drivers and other riders that share the roads with you. So you can look at riding a fixie as a “high risk” sport. I like many high risk sports: extreme skiing and technical diving for example. But in both of those examples, if I decide to “go big” and I eat it; or if I try to dive particularly deep, and something goes wrong: in both examples, I am the only one who pays. On a bike, you are running into someone or something that had no part in your “deal with the devil”. But it makes no freaking difference and you don’t care, so do as you will.
September 14th, 2010 @2:28 pm
i do care. i am not one who doesnt care if he hurts somebody else.
i think my style of riding does not endanger anybody (most of the time)…thats what i think.
but i have to admit that all the comments here plus my hurting knees have convinced me to buy a brake. i think i will still enjoy brakeless riding through the city once in a while but i will buy a brake in the near future.
September 14th, 2010 @2:39 pm
It has been said before: just because you have a brake doesn’t mean you use a brake. It really can be there for the unexpected moment. And your bike is so beautiful that it can handle a brake without losing style (I am not being ironic- you have a great ride)
September 14th, 2010 @2:58 pm
I can’t help myself…..I said I was over this topic but….I guess not. This whole brake(less) thing is about “being cool”. All this talk about being “one” with the bike and “total control” or “flow” is bullshit. Having a brake that you can choose to or choose not to use doesn’t determine your abilities. Things like the “flow” are made up to try to justify not having a brake. It’s about image. It’s partly that the bike looks cleaner without a brake…we all know that… but mostly about what other fixed riders will think of you if you have a brake….which is just f’n stupid. If your friends judge you down because you place common sense above “looking cool” then you have lame friends. I know plenty of people who are great riders and have a brake for the “oh shit” moment….which depending on where you ride will happen…it’s just a matter of how frequently. It really just comes down to what you think is “cool”. If you think having to slow down a half block early because you don’t know what color the light will be when you get there is cool….ok but I don’t. If you think slamming into some old lady’s car looks cool…..ok… I don’t. And if you think hurting someone crossing the street is cool….ok but it isn’t. Lets call this debate what it is…..IMAGE. I don’t care what people ride…brake or no brake. But you better be ready to accept your fate if shit goes down and you don’t have one.
September 14th, 2010 @4:34 pm
yeah you are right. i think there is still more to riding brakeless then just the cool feel and look. but i`d say its 90% image haha.
my first fixed had a brake. then after a while i realised that i dont use it. so i took it off. i thought that “real” fixed gear feeling and look was about brakeless. so i tried it and got used to it.
now i got to the point that i want a brake again.
also in my community i see a lot of guys that rode no brakes are going back to having a front brake again.
i think i dont need to explain myself anymore…. haha its really hard for me to do.
oh and thanks fab. even though the bike looks like this right now (i still think it got style ha)
http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/7396/dsc00351kv.jpg
i am thinking of a nice silver dia compe brake and some bmx style lever. any recommandations?
September 14th, 2010 @5:10 pm
daniel, that wasn’t aimed at you…it was for the general population. You should look at Paul Components. He makes awesome stuff.
September 15th, 2010 @2:32 am
heh i do admit riding brakeless is largely about style and image, but isn’t image what riding fixed is all about? we’re all trying to look better than the other guy, otherwise we’d all be riding cheap kmart bikes (and you guys wouldn’t be getting so hilariously mad here).
i will say the most problems i encounter in the streets are idiot bikers and blindly jaywalking pedestrians.
September 15th, 2010 @5:29 am
Yet another “I’m in control” brakeless argument. I don’t like this setup or the logic.
September 15th, 2010 @6:29 am
I ride for fitness and enjoyment,damn othersImage perceptions.Shallow hipsters worried about what others think are the problem that real riders face.John Q.Public finds it easier to lump us(bike-riders)all together and real riders have to share the asshats bad image.sucks.
September 15th, 2010 @8:10 am
Good point, sloman. Throwing caution to the wind for your social image is stupid. Just look at the image illthedj posted on riding brakeless: the guy screams, skids, and slams into this kid while bystanders watch in horror. Now that’s what I call cool!!
September 15th, 2010 @1:30 pm
Dr Leaf, you have a wildly different concept of why to ride than I and I’d say most commuters do. People don’t buy kmart bikes because they want to ride something that looks cooler, they don’t buy them because they don’t want something that rides like shit.
=
Really, when I see a bike made for commuting that doesn’t have a brake or tape or whatever else is cool to leave off at the moment it doesn’t look clean to me, it just looks unfinished. It’s like if it was cool to start walking around without pants but still with socks and shoes.
=
Sorry for stirring the pot guys, I just know how easily influenced kids are online with stuff like this and its hard to let it slide when people are potentially putting other people’s lives in danger.
September 15th, 2010 @2:39 pm
Um…well….for me riding fixed is simply about fun. I have never tried to “outcool” the other guy….that just happens naturally(just kidding). I prefer to give an affirmative nod to almost anyone on a bike regardless of the type in support of their choice over a car….I say “almost anyone” because there are obviously complete idiots on bikes too..ie. “salmon”, tweekers etc. and the occasional rider who’s only on his bike cuz his car is in the shop…(they’re usually the “salmon” ppl I’m talking about) I think we need to invest more energy in the global bicycle “community” and spend less judging people on what they ride. Yeah of course we all have our “tastes”..but lets not take it to the point of bashing each other….too much. Anyway, sorry for the bicycle-hippie vibe rant…but I really do think us cyclists need to stick together.
September 15th, 2010 @5:57 pm
I agree with both CS and ng. I ride and build fixed for my own enjoyment. If you guys should like what I ride then great, but your opinion won’t define my style (or in this case safety). In regard to the community and what not, I admire bikes that their owners have obviously put some thought into, but try not to chastise the commuters either; meaning I’ll think “that’s cool,” rather than “that’s cooler than those,” or “those really suck by comparison.” Along the same line of thought, I would never spot a brake on a fixed and think “that’s not cool,” or see a brakeless and think “that’s cool because it’s dangerous.” I swear this trend is so much like cigarettes; when you have doctors (leaf for example) telling you it’s okay one would want to believe them.
September 15th, 2010 @7:28 pm
agreed with leaf since the get go. all these faliure paoint are there with or without breaks when it comes down to the nitty gritty jump off the bike or just do a classic foot jam sukkas
September 15th, 2010 @8:33 pm
It’s doubtful Dr. Leaf is and Orthopedic surgeon. Dr. of Divinity ? or Doc Severensen type.
September 15th, 2010 @11:46 pm
also agree with both CS,ng & Pblade,you guys have discribed pretty much my ideals.
September 17th, 2010 @10:54 pm
Lol, woody you crack me up. He’s a doctor of journalism!! Long live Gonzo (not the muppet).
September 18th, 2010 @5:51 am
If he does not draw blood , he is not a real doctor. Luftie was into Journalism too.
September 18th, 2010 @6:39 am
Gonzo isn’t really journalism Woody. It’s more fictional than anything.
September 18th, 2010 @10:09 am
as a style,it’s almost passe’.found an old copy of”Fear and Loathing” and reread it lately.Amusing in short bits but almost unreadable as a whole.Onetime thought it was great.Drugs and chaos don’t hold the appeal to me they once did.go figure.
September 18th, 2010 @12:15 pm
It’s an acquired taste. His other book Rum Diary is toned down, mainly due to lack of drugs.
September 18th, 2010 @1:27 pm
i thought the movie adaption of the book was well done, terry gilliam is one of my fav directors. a bit caricature-ish but i still enjoyed
September 18th, 2010 @1:54 pm
Punch.you’re preaching to the choir.Thompson is still one of my favorite writers.most of it holds up,even “F&L in LV” still has it’s moments but tend to more structured reading nowdays.old and all that ya know,cheers
September 18th, 2010 @4:06 pm
I love it: both people who are adamant about riding brakeless admitted freely that they ride brakeless for image and attitude. And they ask, doesn’t everyone? Uh….no. I ride fixed in NYC because I believe I have more control and am less likely to get coaxed into not paying attention than I do with a freewheel. Plus the silence is just exquisite.
September 18th, 2010 @6:23 pm
I am surprised you can be aware of the silence of a fixed gear in N.Y. I agree the silence is beautiful, to ride with the wind is a liberating feeling, close to what I imagine it must be like to glide like a bird.
September 18th, 2010 @9:32 pm
Good call boys. That silence is exquisite. Especially with a good quality transmission and plenty of grease.
Sloman, I’m glad to hear he’s a favorite. Thompson, Vonnegut, Hemingway, Kerouac, Bukowski are my top five.
September 20th, 2010 @1:11 am
I have broken several chains on fixed(mainly the wonderlink failing) and yes it can jam things up. I tend to do without those snap link gizzmos now. I am not a powerfull cyclist, so I can only assume that I’m much safer having a brake to fall back on (46 and still here guys) Now the bike above. MEH! Why do that to a speed frame? They weren’t meant to be comfortable in the 1st place. (shakes head and shuffles off in search of his nurse)
September 20th, 2010 @6:19 am
Punch,agtee with all except Hemingway.Plug in Fitzgerald and Chandler,Hemingway is too hit or miss for me.he’s either very good or rambling ,somrtimes in the same sentence.and add Steinbeck to the list.oh and-and-so many books,so little time.
September 20th, 2010 @11:03 am
The Great Gatsby is exquisite but that’s all he’s known for. Critics regarded his other novels as trash unfortunately. Steinbeck is great, though a bit too in love and rambling on about nature like Thoreau or Wordsworth. I’m just starting Steinbeck’s The Long Valley (story collection), Shakespeare’s The Tempest, and a Poe anthology.
Alan—totally agree with you. If he wanted a commuter why not get a Traveler or Record or something. Frames like this belong on the track—period.
September 20th, 2010 @12:57 pm
Oh Bullshit, why ride a Huffy when you can ride a Raleigh Competition. All books belong in the Library. ! not !!! ride and get there any way you want
September 20th, 2010 @1:55 pm
There’s no need to lose your temper, Wood. I’d just rather see this with pursuits or drops, cages, straps, and a kashimax or something. You know, proper RACE MODE. Rather than ape hangers, no cages, freestyle straps, and a frame papered in sunday’s comic strips.
September 20th, 2010 @2:15 pm
That’s why I like this bike….the fact that it isn’t dressed in what most ppl would expect or want to see.
As for the talk about the silence of a proper fixed drive chain. I love the purrrr…..the soft sound of the cog and the chain coming together. So nice!
September 20th, 2010 @2:16 pm
*drive train
September 20th, 2010 @2:16 pm
this is a rather tasteless way to treat a decent frame but nothings irreversible.no class,no taste but no real foul.and it is his ride.
September 20th, 2010 @2:44 pm
Not feeling the vibe of this, I preferred the previous incarnation.
I do like the frame, wheels and cranks, but I’d have pursuit bars, Mavic brake, Campag bar end lever, prologo or fizik saddle and Mavic clipless pedals. just my opinion
September 20th, 2010 @3:53 pm
in other words a respectful presentation with a view towards the original design.not “in your face dudes” ‘tude .
September 20th, 2010 @5:28 pm
Yes, of course. But there are some days when you want to do your own thing. ( most days ) and ride naked if it pleases you and screw the race mode when not interested in racing. All opinions and on Monday you may not feel the same as on Friday. And if it rains, take the bike with mudguards and platform pedals and the two speed dorky duomatic coaster hub with coaster brake and apehanger bars. *and where is Dr. Leaf ? ( Hemingway and Steinbeck don’t compare with John Grisham )
September 20th, 2010 @5:37 pm
Grisham tells storys(very well).Steinbeck,Fitzgerald write.Hemingway writes stories .Maybe in time Grisham’s stock will rise beyond best seller status.Oh and when you ride naked in the rain we all want pictures for a new message board LOL.cheers
September 20th, 2010 @6:32 pm
OK but at night, no flash.
September 20th, 2010 @6:51 pm
For some reason the cover of that Queen record is coming to mind…
September 20th, 2010 @6:55 pm
For some reason the cover of that Queen record is coming to mind….Maybe because there is a big blowup of it in the back of the bike shop where I have been spending a ton of time….(my complexity amazes even me sometimes!)
September 20th, 2010 @7:21 pm
Here’s a good version: http://ninamariebarbuto.blogspot.com/2009/08/sheer-beauty.html
September 20th, 2010 @7:46 pm
Good work, Federico. Someone should use it as gravatar !
September 20th, 2010 @8:16 pm
your wish is my command…I’ll go back to the hammerheads one day…
September 20th, 2010 @8:17 pm
or it’ll take a second to switch, but hold your horses…
September 20th, 2010 @8:51 pm
A couple of them are worthy of a
Zoom in . Is this a Bi event only ? Such a poor choice.
September 20th, 2010 @9:05 pm
fat bottomed girls,you make the rocking world go round
get on a bike and ride
September 20th, 2010 @9:06 pm
Queen did the picking. Welcome to the sag of the 70s! And Freddy Mercury probably didn’t care too much. Having been in more than one session where bands were talking about record covers, I love to imagine the conversation: “I got it! I want 150 naked broads on bicycles! That’s it! Make it happen”
–
Genius
September 20th, 2010 @9:08 pm
If you get the right zoom in, it can get amusing…
September 20th, 2010 @9:10 pm
Woody – you fricking made my week (and yes I am easily amused). Thank you!
September 20th, 2010 @11:01 pm
Sorry Woody, but John Grisham writes commercial fluff. If you want real literature it won’t be found on a best sellout list. My problem with this bike isn’t the bike but the attitude it’s presented with. It just feels like a hipster’s wet dream: dangerous, impractical, contradictory, art deco. Hey—do what you want, I sure as hell do. This is just what I’m thinking on a brisk Monday night after watching Robert DeNiro kill some pimps in Taxi Driver, 1973. Maybe I’m feeling a little anarchistic myself.
September 29th, 2010 @10:21 am
Of mice and Men was nonsense for my reading pleasure as was The Old Man and the Sea. Sheldon Brown writes well and pertinent material. Lots of fluff sells, e.g. Hugh Hefner’s magazn. Holden Caulfield as in Great Expectations Luftie ?
September 29th, 2010 @10:38 am
lots of levels to Mice and Men.Good pleasure read Steinbeck is “Winter of Our Discontent”.More story,less agenda.or”Sweet Thursday”.”Travels with Charlie”is the ultimate lite read.Not real Steinbeck by me.
September 29th, 2010 @10:45 am
Thanks Sloman, I’ll give them a try. Problem is I am already discontent in the winter . thanks , may have to read with a beer in hand.
September 29th, 2010 @10:49 am
it never hurts.enjoy
January 2nd, 2011 @2:02 pm
I like the frame decorations, are they simply stickers or treated to a top coat of some sort. Still do Not like the High bars on this ride, flats would be better it seems.
April 3rd, 2011 @3:33 pm
This thing is so “out there” and all over the place that I actually like it.
As for riding brakeless, some valid points have been said for and against. Riding brakeless is all about riding it responsibly, and I am aware that that may sound like quite a paradox! Here’s the deal: Never go full-out if you don’t have a good view on what could happen in front of you. Also: Prepare that everything in front of you develops into a worst case scenario: “That woman probably walks up on the street without looking. This car hasn’t seen me. He’s going to open his door. There might be a car coming from behind that building” etc. What I like about it is how it affects one’s awareness, eyes wide open, I pay attention to any detail. I know I should also ride like that when I have brakes, but I don’t. My riskiest adversaries on the streets are not cars, but other cyclists that have brakes and are only half-aware on their bikes in the mornings. (Of course, I’m describing the Netherlands. Your country may be dramatically different.) As for running a brake for backup, I’ve had one on my former frame but it didn’t help. When there suddenly was an emergency, grabbing the brake was not in my system anymore so that option only sprung to my mind after the moment I needed it. I skid stopped and dodged the car. So for me riding brakeless has little to do with the cool factor, and more with completing the riding experience. I’d be the first to admit it is more dangerous, so concentrate and don’t bring any others in danger. There’s nothing cool about running into something or someone.
April 3rd, 2011 @3:41 pm
Oh and as for knee pain, it is important to slowly build it up. It also helps to hop when skidding, get the weight off the rear wheel just a fraction of a second and it’s much easier to lock. If you want to skid with relatively high ratio’s its important to keep it up and ride often. Once or twice a week won’t do, so casual riders better go for something light. Choose your gear wisely. I always like ratios with 17t cogs because of the many skid patches they provide. It’s also important to have a backup plan for when the chain snaps. Put your foot on the rear wheel, it will serve as a very effective brake. -!!!Practice this often!!!- you might need it someday. The method is pretty foolproof but needs to get in your system.
April 3rd, 2011 @3:57 pm
@Peter. Thoughtful, well-written response to all us brake advocates. I still haven’t heard a good reason not to have a brake on a bike. Do they weigh too much? Does the cable interfere with your concentration?
April 3rd, 2011 @7:10 pm
Why set up a pursuit frame if you’re just going to put tall bars on it? missing the point.
April 5th, 2011 @2:25 am
@jqnyc Thanks. My personal reason not to mount a brake is because I love to know I can’t fall back on it. It completes the experience of oneness that I don’t get with a brake. I love the fact I needed lots of practice to get it under control. Secondary to that, but also of importance is that I don’t want to mess up a nice vintage track frame with a brake. The forks are not well suited because they are not built to hold a wheel that is stopped and will flex and possibly even snap after a while due to metal fatigue. I don’t want to ride a conversion because I like the uncompromised handling characteristics and stiffness of a track bike. It’s like putting a track racing car on the open road, it doesn’t belong there and that’s what makes it exciting. I like it raw and uncompromised.
April 28th, 2011 @7:59 pm
Some people do it, others cannot…
NO BRAKES, NO FEAR, FIXED GEAR!
May 17th, 2011 @1:20 am
cool people dont need brakes and helmets…so cool…wait,
July 5th, 2011 @1:15 pm
I’ll ride that.. Looks like a nice grocery getter..
October 4th, 2011 @10:37 pm
I like the sticker collage and frame. Very cool.
October 5th, 2011 @12:00 pm
And in theory, if brakes are for pussies then no brakes are for dicks
October 5th, 2011 @2:26 pm
this shit is nasty a.f.
everything about this bike disgust me in every way imaginable
downgrading at this point would be better.
October 5th, 2011 @2:27 pm
This fixie is nasty a.f.
This makes me sick in every way imaginable
downgrading at this point would be better than this
November 7th, 2011 @12:46 pm
That’s one hell of a way to use a frame like that. I still like it. It’s got attitude.
Leave A Reply